Reason 的 granular synthesis

本文由 evan2003-11-09 發表於 "MIDI、合成器" 討論區

  1. evan

    evan New Member

    註冊日期:
    2001-09-16
    文章:
    244
    讚:
    0
    很久以前在這裡看到板主提到granular synthesis,開始也想在reason上的Malstrom上玩玩看,以前都沒玩。可是它的gran為什麼都是內設好的,不能自己切一小段聲音來做?也不太能選每一片要跑幾次....這樣很正常嗎?還是我沒玩通reason 上的呢?我用window XP、Reason 2.X。
     
  2. 掌門人

    掌門人 當代校長張超然

    註冊日期:
    2001-08-30
    文章:
    4,575
    讚:
    824
  3. 掌門人

    掌門人 當代校長張超然

    註冊日期:
    2001-08-30
    文章:
    4,575
    讚:
    824
    </font><blockquote>引言:</font><hr />I don't think u can finish that much combination on malstrom....just keep playing.....don't say too much about which is limit or else ok?....... </font>[/QUOTE]反應會不會太.....?
    純指如你所說 Reason 的 Malstrom 是混合體,因而只能單純地 program "motion"、"index" 這些參數。而指 Reason 的限制也很自然,它是一整個 package,因此每個單項不若獨立的專門軟體完善。以 2.5 version 為例,FM 要從哪來?買 FM7 的人錢太多?如果沒用錯,NN-XT 有 Key Swtich mapping ?Subtractor 有 OSC 3?

    而 Subtractor 的音底亦十分明顯,要否只要兩個 OSC 和 ADSR、2 filters 等,那每個軟體豈非聲音一樣?Red Drum 用硬體的方式思考的 interface....。就只因為上面有個 advance reverb,並不表示花更多錢買 sampling reverb 就該受到那 reverb rack 的限制。

    It's really a great package for $300 USD, but you always get what you paid for.
     
  4. g4synth

    g4synth New Member

    註冊日期:
    2003-07-23
    文章:
    22
    讚:
    0
    ---It's really a great package for $300 USD, but you always get what you paid for----

    1-For me.....this program just like $ 20000 USD.....I have spend such kind of money on my Midi stuff before.....but i switch it all.
    U really know how to program a FM synth..(我下過苦心在FM上是你無法想的...包括Reason.---Mr.CJ know how hard it is on FM.)& not only this synth only.

    2-實戰經驗比一堆理論來的有用...isn't it?
    3-I have use Reason (what u call --$300 USD, but you always get what you paid for)

    This is my self info:
    簡介:曾任藍色精靈第一代鍵盤手 , 黃大煒巡迴Live鍵盤手
    阮丹青Live鍵盤手. 8866唱片宣傳鍵盤手
    Yamaha功學社熱門樂器部+X'Wave Midi音樂教師 +示範演奏者
    海國樂器Midi樂器教師.Magic音樂發生中心Midi講師.
    敦煌樂器Midi樂器教師,Midimall Midi樂器教師
    A-Pa樂器Midi樂器教師,0.3音樂中心Midi音樂教師.
    陸光藝工2隊鍵盤手,飛碟唱片製作部助理,李壽全音樂製作助理.
    新力音樂Epic Sony製作協力.
    作曲:丁小芹Walking2000...Sony's singer....etc
    台北中正紀念堂元宵節燈會2屆作曲.
    編曲:CoCo Di Da Di Remix , GoGo&MeiMei ,許慧欣專輯,
    張懸專輯Peggy專輯(Recording player).
    電影配樂 夕陽天使 So close(Columbia Pictures出品)
    & secret project.

    Last few things i do all made with Reason only.
    include 電影配樂 夕陽天使 So close , 許慧欣專輯, etc.

    4-I don't like to debate with anyone here....just say if any newbie can pay more attention on their music skill...software or hardware will change thru time.....music skill & sense is only thing u need.....that's my purpose.

    G4synth.
     
  5. g4synth

    g4synth New Member

    註冊日期:
    2003-07-23
    文章:
    22
    讚:
    0
    1-Sorry....Reason's malstrom is not a ---- Pure Granular synth.....it's a Half...other one is just like wavetable.
    So that's why it call Grantable synth.

    2-If u really know how to make sound.....i don't think there are -- that limit if u r good at programming sound. even on subtractor.

    3-If u really have that -- Universal Time.....sure u can make your own granular slice......but i am sure u won't like to do this.

    next generation's malstrom may carry more grantable wave for it's OSC for ur need.....

    I don't think u can finish that much combination on malstrom....just keep playing.....don't say too much about which is limit or else ok?.......

    ------g4synth.
     
  6. charmingguy

    charmingguy New Member

    註冊日期:
    2001-09-15
    文章:
    415
    讚:
    0
    to g4synth
    有時閒談談你在這些project里的實戰經驗嘍,希望有經驗的職業人士多發表意見
     
  7. g4synth

    g4synth New Member

    註冊日期:
    2003-07-23
    文章:
    22
    讚:
    0
    實戰經驗 is very difficult to say in language or text for me.
    but sometimes i can offer some answers to those ppl who like to work/play in reason with puzzles.

    After a period of time...i hope i can make more great stuff in reason & share more experiences for more ppl ( new interactive cd's demo will come out soon....tools by reason only.)
     

分享此頁面