PRS Singlecut 被迫停產了

本文由 Dragon2004-07-23 發表於 "吉他" 討論區

  1. Dragon

    Dragon 版主

    註冊日期:
    2002-10-24
    文章:
    1,372
    讚:
    8
  2. Dragon

    Dragon 版主

    註冊日期:
    2002-10-24
    文章:
    1,372
    讚:
    8
    http://www.prsguitars.com/showcase/current/singlecut.html
    連 Tremonti model, Singlecut Trem 和 SE 系列的 Singlecut 都一樣

    最近官方網站貼出這樣的告示

    What has happened -

    In 2000 PRS guitars introduced the Singlecut model at the NAMM show in Los Angeles. This instrument received numerous awards world-wide and is well accepted in the market place.
    In our opinion the PRS Singlecut was, and is, a design that shows every aspect and detail of what we believe a PRS instrument to be.

    One of our competitors filed a lawsuit against us contesting the design of the Singlecut based on the competitor’s registered trademark. In this still pending litigation, the trial court issued an injunction, preventing us from manufacturing, distributing, selling, promoting or offering PRS Singlecut designs in the United States of America.

    What we are doing -

    After receiving the above notice, we immediately ceased our production, our distribution and marketing of all Singlecut designs manufactured in the United States.
    We have also stopped sales and distribution of SE model Singlecuts in the US.
    Immediately and until further notice we are removing all references and photographs pertaining to Singlecut type products from our website and printed material. We will not be shipping catalogs, pricelists, DVD’s and accessory brochures until revised literature is available.

    Thank You -

    We appreciate your patience, understanding and support as we go through this process.
     
  3. petit chien

    petit chien Member

    註冊日期:
    2002-04-18
    文章:
    181
    讚:
    1
    唉....真遺憾.....
     
  4. 老江

    老江 Member

    註冊日期:
    2003-06-30
    文章:
    539
    讚:
    13
    Gibson發現自己市場被瓜分了才會作這樣的事情吧 竟然還讓他們告贏了 雖然我也很喜歡GIBSON 可是年年漲價 讓人下不了手阿 其實PRS應該可以藉由付權利金給GIBSON 來繼續生產singlecut 不過 如果真的這樣 那麼權利金只會轉嫁到消費者身上而已 唉 GIBSON不想辦法創新 只靠著自己過去的MODEL 一直REISSUE 終於遇到對手了卻用這樣的途徑 最好的方法應該是GISBSON自己想辦法提高市佔率 唉........第一篇還提到Taylor, Peavey,J. D’Addario公司聯合起來跟法官抗議,說PRS生產單缺角的吉他並不會讓消費者產生混淆(這是法官判PRS敗訴的原因),各位有人因為PRS是單缺角就不買GIBSON的嗎 應該是因為PRS的品質跟TONE的關係吧...這個法官不知道在想什麼。
     
  5. 好多吉它

    好多吉它 New Member

    註冊日期:
    2004-07-19
    文章:
    139
    讚:
    0
    因為在美國PRS Singlecut的琴銷售與售受好評的程度都遠超過Gibson Custom Shop Les Paul才使得他們不爽要告PRS
    事實上現在大部份的琴不是仿Les Paul就是仿Stratocaster如果Fender也要告的話那Tom Anderson, Shur等豈不是也傷腦筋了
    目前有做Les Paul樣子的品牌除了PRS外還有很多阿
     
  6. 我愛2號

    我愛2號 Active Member

    註冊日期:
    2004-04-24
    文章:
    3,048
    讚:
    13
    還是Ibanez/Jackson/ESP好^^a"
    沒有權利金的問題~不像Tom Aderson那麼貴但是你花的錢大半在權利金上面,也不會像兩家老字號的吉他電薛價錢敲消費者足槓~看Gibson越來越不爽ㄌ><
     
  7. 王咪

    王咪 Member

    註冊日期:
    2003-12-05
    文章:
    57
    讚:
    0
    我支持大家ㄉ說法~!
    以前有一把gibson
    後來覺得不適合賣了....
     
  8. Crybaby

    Crybaby Member

    註冊日期:
    2003-03-09
    文章:
    442
    讚:
    0
    可能法官大人也彈琴
    也可能正好不爽PRS...
     
  9. 笨大白

    笨大白 Active Member

    註冊日期:
    2003-09-05
    文章:
    2,471
    讚:
    5
    其實single cut...也便宜不到哪裡去就是了...貴不嚨咚...
     
  10. youna

    youna New Member

    註冊日期:
    2003-09-21
    文章:
    384
    讚:
    0
    還好我喜歡的是custom 22和mccarty
     
  11. -Ray-

    -Ray- New Member

    註冊日期:
    2003-07-12
    文章:
    476
    讚:
    0
    其實Prs和Gibson我都喜歡
    (還是Gibson多喜歡一點~ㄎㄎㄎ)
    不過Gibson這次的行為真是令人無言

    但是..都是Single Cut...Gibson的痛還是有一種不可取代性拉...





    但是LP賣太貴拉!!= =
     
  12. 我愛2號

    我愛2號 Active Member

    註冊日期:
    2004-04-24
    文章:
    3,048
    讚:
    13
    還好我偏愛Killer/Jackson
    絕對沒這種問題啦^0^
     

分享此頁面